Abstract Background
Weekly Commentary Banner
Posted on MAY 22, 2017

Johnson Bank Wealth Weekly Investment Commentary | Monday, May 22

This is part of an ongoing series of Weekly Commentary articles published by Johnson Financial Group.
This week's issue is written by Brian Andrew, SVP, Chief Investment Officer.

Returning to Normal

According to Google, “normal” can either be defined as a city in the state of Illinois or a word that describes a condition as typical, average or usual. Today's political environment seems a little less usual. The Trump administration seems to be having a hard time staying on point with regard to health care and tax reform. However, bond investors, unlike the administration, seem to be returning to a more typical state.

Trying to Help

We have experienced almost a decade of unprecedented central bank intervention in bond markets. Ever since the 2008‐2009 financial crisis, central bankers in the U.S., Europe and Japan have taken it upon themselves to provide an unusual amount of stimulus to prime the global economic pump. Even the central bank in China has gotten in on the act in the last several years as it manages the transition from an export to consumption‐driven economy.

The approach to this stimulus came in two forms. The first, very low interest rates, began when the Fed reduced the federal funds rate to near 0% in 2009. As you can see from this chart of the Effective Federal Funds Rate, once there, it remained until December of 2015 when the Fed raised the rate by .25%. Since then, it has raised it twice more.

Graph showing the effective federal funds rate from 2008 until 2017.

These low interest rates were promulgated in order to make borrowing money inexpensive. The hope was that cheap money would stir demand for capital which would result in business investment and consumption. When this didn't work, the Fed began its first of several quantitative easing programs. These programs allowed the Fed to increase the amount of its purchases of Treasury and mortgage‐backed bonds. The dollars used to make these purchases went into the financial system. The hope was that this additional liquidity would make its way into the economy and create investment and consumption. While it is difficult to say that the program had the Fed's intended consequence, it is easy to point out that the flood of liquidity most likely improved asset prices. As rates declined and the Fed purchased Treasury bonds, it led to higher bond prices in all sectors of the bond market, including corporate and municipal bonds. Lower yields and higher prices likely drove some money from the bond market to other assets such as stocks, in particular, those that pay a higher dividend, as investors sought alternative sources of income. This bond purchase program ended more than a year ago.

The fact that the Fed has begun to raise rates and ended its bond purchase program is an acknowledgement that the economy is returning to “normal” and no longer requires special efforts to generate greater economic growth. This does not mean that growth is normal; rather it means the Federal Open Market Committee (the group responsible for setting rates) believes that it is no longer necessary to take extraordinary measures.

What Now

When we remove the interventionist policies of the central bank from the bond market, it too should return to normal. In normal times, the key drivers of the bond market include the supply and demand for the government's Treasury debt, the rate of economic growth and its effect on the rate of inflation. In this way, the fiscal policy steps taken by the administration and Congress will influence interest rates.

Think back to the November election. In one week, the yield on a 10‐year Treasury rose from 1.88% the day of the election to almost 2.25% the following Tuesday. Within a month, its yield was above 2.6%. The election marked the official hand‐off from central bankers' monetary policies to the federal government's fiscal policies.

Rates moved higher because the then president‐elect had made it clear that he was interested in spending money on infrastructure and reducing corporate and individual taxes. Both of these have a cost that would likely increase the government's deficit, which in turn raises the supply of Treasury debt. If demand remained equal, then interest rates would have to rise, and they did. The market's anticipation of tax reform also led investors to conclude that economic growth could pick up along with inflation. This, too, led to higher interest rates.

In other words, bond investors immediately discounted the new administration's plan because not only did Trump win, Congress was also in the Republicans' control. What's happened to bond yields now that things look more normal? After the initial discounting that raised bond yields almost 1%, investors caught a glimpse of just how difficult it will be to change fiscal policies. With the pace of reform appearing to be slower than originally thought, bond yields have retraced some of their rise. The 10‐year Treasury now sits closer to 2.2% — 0.4% lower than where it was in January.

What's exciting about this? It is normal. Bond investors have returned to an environment where they take in information about the supply and demand for bonds, pace of economic growth and inflation, the policies affecting monetary and fiscal policy and then price securities accordingly. We should take comfort in this progress and the fact that the market is indicating the return to normal will take some time, meaning interest rates may rise gradually at a pace that is helpful not harmful to investors.

Brian Andrew
As Chief Investment Officer, Brian Andrew leads Johnson Financial Group's investment strategy
to provide consistent, actionable investment solutions for our clients.

You May Also Like

  • Posted on MAY 1, 2017

    Johnson Bank Wealth Weekly Investment Commentary | Monday, May 1

    This is part of an ongoing series of Weekly Commentary articles published by Johnson Financial Group. This week's issue is written by Brian Andrew, SVP, Chief Investment Officer. Beginning or End? We are more than half way through corporate earnings season.

  • Posted on MAY 15, 2017

    Johnson Bank Wealth Weekly Investment Commentary | Monday, May 15

    This is part of an ongoing series of Weekly Commentary articles published by Johnson Financial Group. This week's issue is written by Brian Andrew, SVP, Chief Investment Officer. Going to Prom It's prom season. When I went to prom, it included

This information is for educational and illustrative purposes only and should not be used or construed as financial advice, an offer to sell, a solicitation, an offer to buy or a recommendation for any security. Opinions expressed herein are as of the date of this report and do not necessarily represent the views of Johnson Financial Group and/or its affiliates. Johnson Financial Group and/or its affiliates may issue reports or have opinions that are inconsistent with this report. Johnson Financial Group and/or its affiliates do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein. Such information is subject to change without notice and is not intended to influence your investment decisions. Johnson Financial Group and/or its affiliates do not provide legal or tax advice to clients. You should review your particular circumstances with your independent legal and tax advisors. Whether any planned tax result is realized by you depends on the specific facts of your own situation at the time your taxes are prepared. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All performance data, while deemed obtained from reliable sources, are not guaranteed for accuracy. Not for use as a primary basis of investment decisions. Not to be construed to meet the needs of any particular investor. Asset allocation and diversification do not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. Certain investments, like real estate, equity investments and fixed income securities, carry a certain degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Johnson Financial Group is the parent company of Johnson Bank, Cleary Gull Advisors Inc. and Johnson Insurance Services LLC. NOT FDIC INSURED * NO BANK GUARANTEE * MAY LOSE VALUE

J Mark Logo

STAY UP TO DATE

Sign up for our newsletters so you can have the latest delivered to your fingertips.

Newsletter Types
Download Adobe Acrobat Reader